Skip to main content

Vroom's Theory

  


Expectancy theory or expectancy theory of motivation proposes that an individual will behave or act in a certain way because they are Motivated to select a specific behavior over others due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be. In essence, the motivation of the behavior selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave.

Expectancy theory is about the mental processes regarding choice, or choosing. It explains the processes that an individual undergoes to make choices. In the study of organizational Behavior  expectancy theory is a motivation theory first proposed by Victor Vroom of the Yale School of Management.

ASSUMPTIONS ON WHICH EXPECTANCY THEORY IS BUILT:-- 

Self concept and Self Efficacy

People join organizations with expectations about their needs, motivations, and past experience. These influence how individuals react to the organization. 

 • An individual’s behavior is a result of conscious choice. That is, people are free to choose those behaviors suggested by their own expectancy calculations. 

• People want different things from the organization (e.g.., good salary, job security, advancement, and challenge).

This theory build around the concept

• EXPECTANCY • INSTRUMENTALITY • VALENCE

Therefore , it is called VIE Theory

Maslaw's Theory and Herzberg Two Factors Theory were based on the relationship between internal needs and the resulting effort expended to fulfil them, while Vroom’s Expectancy Theory separates effort, performance and outcomes.

Expectancy

Expectancy means an individual belief that particular degree of effort will lead to increased performance. "BELIEF THAT AN INCREASE IN EFFORTS WILL RESULT IN AN INCREASE IN PERFORMANCE."

Example: if I work harder then this will be better.

Instrumentality

Instrumentality represent a person’s belief that a particular outcome is dependent on a specific level of performance. "Belief that increased PERFORMANCE WILL LEAD INCREASED CERTAIN OUTCOMES. "

Example: superior performance is instrumental in getting a promotion.

Valence

Valence refers to the positive or negative value the people place on outcome. "Extent to which the outcome is desirable. OR AMOUNT OF SATISFACTION (an individual anticipates from particular outcome)"

Example: If an employee has a strong preference for attaining a reward, valence is positive.

Advantage

•It recognizes individual differences in work motivation and suggested that motivation is a complex process as compared to MASLOW’S or HERZBERG’S simplistic models. 

•It also clarifies the relationship between individual and organizational goals. 

•Puts human resources into action :- Building willingness into action.

Disadvantage/Limitation

•Vroom’s theory indicates only the conceptual determinants of motivation and how they are related . It does not provide specific suggestions on what motivates organizational members as the MASLOW HERZBERG models do.

 • The theory is complex and its validity cannot be fully tested. 

•The application of this theory is limited as reward is not directly correlated with performance in many organizations. It is related to other parameters also such as position , efforts , responsibility , education ,etc.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Locke's Goal-Setting Theory

In the late 1960s, Locke's pioneering research into goal setting and motivation gave us our modern understanding of goal setting. In his 1968 article "Towards a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentive   ," he showed that clear goals and appropriate feedback motivate employees. He went on to highlight that working toward a goal is also a major source of motivation – which, in turn, improves performance. Locke's research showed that the more difficult and specific a goal is, the harder people tend to work to achieve it. In one study, Locke reviewed a decade's worth of laboratory and field studies on the effects of goal setting and performance. He found that, for 90 percent of the time, specific and challenging (but not too challenging) goals led to higher performance than easy, or "do your best," goals. For example, telling someone to "try hard" or "do your best" is less effective than saying "try to get more than 80 percent correc

Future of Cloud Computing 2020 and Beyond

  Cloud computing has become a fundamental requirement for most organizations. With this in mind,  cloud computing  is massively increase within the current day on the rise in the current day and age. In fact, 81 % of the companies with 1,000 employees or more have a multi-platform strategy. The no. is to rise to more than 90 % by the time of 2025. Between 2018 and 2021, worldwide industries and organizations spending on public cloud services is to grow more to 73 % rapidly , from $160Billion  to $277Billion . Cloud computing has been around there for many many years  & this suddenly growth might surprises a lot of the industries players around the world. Cloud computing became  á  phenomenon in the early 20s. However, due to the lack of  á wareness  á bout the potential of technology , many brands hesit á ted to  á dopt it for there products & processe. Bart McDonough , CEO of Agio, believes the recent rapid adoption of cloud is mainly due to the understanding of “ease of usag

Herzberg’s Theory

  Schachter' s theory of emotion, see 2 factors theory of emotion The  two-factor theory  (also known as  Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory  and  dual-factor theory ) states that there are certain factors in the work & places that cause satisfaction in the job while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction , all of which act independently to each other. It was developed by psychologist Frederick Herzberg . In 1959, Frederick Herzberg, a behavioral scientist proposed  two-factor theory or the motivator-hygiene theory. According to Herzberg, there are some job factor that result in satisfaction while there are other job factors that prevent dissatisfactions. According to Herzberg, the opposite of “Satisfaction” is “No satisfactions” and the opposite of “Dissatisfactions” is “No Dissatisfactiosn”. Herzberg classified these job factors into two categories- Hygiene factor -  Hygiene factors are those job factors which are essential for existence of motivation at workpl