Skip to main content

Skinner's Reinforcement Theory



Reinforcement theory of motivation was proposed by BF Skinner and his associates. It states that individual’s behavior is a function of its consequences. It is based on “law of effect”, i.e, individual’s behavior with positive consequences tends to be repeated, but individual’s behavior with negative consequences tends not to be repeated.
Reinforcement theory of motivation overlooks the internal state of individual, i.e., the inner feelings and drives of individuals are ignored by Skinner. This theory focuses totally on what happens to an individual when he takes some action. Thus, according to Skinner, the external environment of the organization must be designed effectively and positively so as to motivate the employee. This theory is a strong tool for analyzing controlling mechanism for individual’s behavior. However, it does not focus on the causes of individual’s behavior.




Reinforcement theory is a limited effects media model applicable within the realm of communication. The theory generally states that people seek out and remember information that provides cognitive support for their pre-existing attitudes and beliefs. The main assumption that guides this theory is that people do not like to be wrong and often feel uncomfortable when their beliefs are challenged.

Additionally, this theory focuses on the behavior to consequence connection within the ABC model. This theory, in management, can also be referred to as operation condition or the Law of effect. Quite simply, this theory notes that a behavior will continue with a certain level of frequency based on pleasant or unpleasant results.

The managers use the following methods for controlling the behavior of the employees:

Positive Reinforcement- This implies giving a positive response when an individual shows positive and required behavior. For example - Immediately praising an employee for coming early for job. This will increase probability of outstanding behavior occurring again. Reward is a positive reinforce, but not necessarily. If and only if the employees’ behavior improves, reward can said to be a positive reinforcer. Positive reinforcement stimulates occurrence of a behavior. It must be noted that more spontaneous is the giving of reward, the greater reinforcement value it has.
Negative Reinforcement- This implies rewarding an employee by removing negative / undesirable consequences. Both positive and negative reinforcement can be used for increasing desirable / required behavior.
Punishment- It implies removing positive consequences so as to lower the probability of repeating undesirable behavior in future. In other words, punishment means applying undesirable consequence for showing undesirable behavior. For instance - Suspending an employee for breaking the organizational rules. Punishment can be equalized by positive reinforcement from alternative source.
Extinction- It implies absence of reinforcements. In other words, extinction implies lowering the probability of undesired behavior by removing reward for that kind of behavior. For instance - if an employee no longer receives praise and admiration for his good work, he may feel that his behavior is generating no fruitful consequence. Extinction may unintentionally lower desirable behavior.
Implications of Reinforcement Theory


Reinforcement theory explains in detail how an individual learns behavior. Managers who are making attempt to motivate the employees must ensure that they do not reward all employees simultaneously. They must tell the employees what they are not doing correct. They must tell the employees how they can achieve positive reinforcement. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Herzberg’s Theory

  Schachter' s theory of emotion, see 2 factors theory of emotion The  two-factor theory  (also known as  Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory  and  dual-factor theory ) states that there are certain factors in the work & places that cause satisfaction in the job while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction , all of which act independently to each other. It was developed by psychologist Frederick Herzberg . In 1959, Frederick Herzberg, a behavioral scientist proposed  two-factor theory or the motivator-hygiene theory. According to Herzberg, there are some job factor that result in satisfaction while there are other job factors that prevent dissatisfactions. According to Herzberg, the opposite of “Satisfaction” is “No satisfactions” and the opposite of “Dissatisfactions” is “No Dissatisfactiosn”. Herzberg classified these job factors into two categories- Hygiene factor -  Hygiene factors are those job...

Porter and Lawler’s Expectancy Theory Adams' Equity Theory

  Porter and Lawler’s Model of Motivation Expectancy theory   or  expectancy theory of motivation  proposes that an individual will behave or act in a certain way because they are motivation to select a specific behavior over others due to what they expect the result of that selected behavior will be.   In essence, the motivation of the behavior selection is determined by the desirability of the outcome. However, at the core of the theory is the cognitive  process of how an individual processes the different motivational elements. This is done before making the ultimate choice. The outcome is not the sole determining factor in making the decision of how to behave. Expectancy theory is about the mental processes regarding choice, or choosing. It explains the processes that an individual undergoes to make choices. In the study of organizational behavior, expectancy theory is a motivation  theory first proposed...