Skip to main content

Skinner's Reinforcement Theory



Reinforcement theory of motivation was proposed by BF Skinner and his associates. It states that individual’s behavior is a function of its consequences. It is based on “law of effect”, i.e, individual’s behavior with positive consequences tends to be repeated, but individual’s behavior with negative consequences tends not to be repeated.
Reinforcement theory of motivation overlooks the internal state of individual, i.e., the inner feelings and drives of individuals are ignored by Skinner. This theory focuses totally on what happens to an individual when he takes some action. Thus, according to Skinner, the external environment of the organization must be designed effectively and positively so as to motivate the employee. This theory is a strong tool for analyzing controlling mechanism for individual’s behavior. However, it does not focus on the causes of individual’s behavior.




Reinforcement theory is a limited effects media model applicable within the realm of communication. The theory generally states that people seek out and remember information that provides cognitive support for their pre-existing attitudes and beliefs. The main assumption that guides this theory is that people do not like to be wrong and often feel uncomfortable when their beliefs are challenged.

Additionally, this theory focuses on the behavior to consequence connection within the ABC model. This theory, in management, can also be referred to as operation condition or the Law of effect. Quite simply, this theory notes that a behavior will continue with a certain level of frequency based on pleasant or unpleasant results.

The managers use the following methods for controlling the behavior of the employees:

Positive Reinforcement- This implies giving a positive response when an individual shows positive and required behavior. For example - Immediately praising an employee for coming early for job. This will increase probability of outstanding behavior occurring again. Reward is a positive reinforce, but not necessarily. If and only if the employees’ behavior improves, reward can said to be a positive reinforcer. Positive reinforcement stimulates occurrence of a behavior. It must be noted that more spontaneous is the giving of reward, the greater reinforcement value it has.
Negative Reinforcement- This implies rewarding an employee by removing negative / undesirable consequences. Both positive and negative reinforcement can be used for increasing desirable / required behavior.
Punishment- It implies removing positive consequences so as to lower the probability of repeating undesirable behavior in future. In other words, punishment means applying undesirable consequence for showing undesirable behavior. For instance - Suspending an employee for breaking the organizational rules. Punishment can be equalized by positive reinforcement from alternative source.
Extinction- It implies absence of reinforcements. In other words, extinction implies lowering the probability of undesired behavior by removing reward for that kind of behavior. For instance - if an employee no longer receives praise and admiration for his good work, he may feel that his behavior is generating no fruitful consequence. Extinction may unintentionally lower desirable behavior.
Implications of Reinforcement Theory


Reinforcement theory explains in detail how an individual learns behavior. Managers who are making attempt to motivate the employees must ensure that they do not reward all employees simultaneously. They must tell the employees what they are not doing correct. They must tell the employees how they can achieve positive reinforcement. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Locke's Goal-Setting Theory

In the late 1960s, Locke's pioneering research into goal setting and motivation gave us our modern understanding of goal setting. In his 1968 article "Towards a Theory of Task Motivation and Incentive   ," he showed that clear goals and appropriate feedback motivate employees. He went on to highlight that working toward a goal is also a major source of motivation – which, in turn, improves performance. Locke's research showed that the more difficult and specific a goal is, the harder people tend to work to achieve it. In one study, Locke reviewed a decade's worth of laboratory and field studies on the effects of goal setting and performance. He found that, for 90 percent of the time, specific and challenging (but not too challenging) goals led to higher performance than easy, or "do your best," goals. For example, telling someone to "try hard" or "do your best" is less effective than saying "try to get more than 80 percent correc
Post a Comment
Read more

Future of Cloud Computing 2020 and Beyond

  Cloud computing has become a fundamental requirement for most organizations. With this in mind,  cloud computing  is massively increase within the current day on the rise in the current day and age. In fact, 81 % of the companies with 1,000 employees or more have a multi-platform strategy. The no. is to rise to more than 90 % by the time of 2025. Between 2018 and 2021, worldwide industries and organizations spending on public cloud services is to grow more to 73 % rapidly , from $160Billion  to $277Billion . Cloud computing has been around there for many many years  & this suddenly growth might surprises a lot of the industries players around the world. Cloud computing became  á  phenomenon in the early 20s. However, due to the lack of  á wareness  á bout the potential of technology , many brands hesit á ted to  á dopt it for there products & processe. Bart McDonough , CEO of Agio, believes the recent rapid adoption of cloud is mainly due to the understanding of “ease of usag
Post a Comment
Read more

Herzberg’s Theory

  Schachter' s theory of emotion, see 2 factors theory of emotion The  two-factor theory  (also known as  Herzberg's motivation-hygiene theory  and  dual-factor theory ) states that there are certain factors in the work & places that cause satisfaction in the job while a separate set of factors cause dissatisfaction , all of which act independently to each other. It was developed by psychologist Frederick Herzberg . In 1959, Frederick Herzberg, a behavioral scientist proposed  two-factor theory or the motivator-hygiene theory. According to Herzberg, there are some job factor that result in satisfaction while there are other job factors that prevent dissatisfactions. According to Herzberg, the opposite of “Satisfaction” is “No satisfactions” and the opposite of “Dissatisfactions” is “No Dissatisfactiosn”. Herzberg classified these job factors into two categories- Hygiene factor -  Hygiene factors are those job factors which are essential for existence of motivation at workpl
Post a Comment
Read more